| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/03/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/08/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
DUDAS, R. T.; DEMETRIO, W. C.; MAIA, L. S.; SÁTIRO, J. N. O.; SILVA, K. A.; NICOLA, V. B.; KILLE, P.; OLIVEIRA, C. M. R.; AFONSO, R. O.; RUSSELL, G.; FERREIRA, N. G. C.; CUNHA, L.; BROWN, G. G.; BARTZ, M. L. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAFAELA T. DUDAS, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; WILIAN C. DEMETRIO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; LILIANE S. MAIA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; JOSÉ N. O. SÁTIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; KARLO A. SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; VITORIA B. NICOLA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; PETER KILLE, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; CINTÍA M. R. OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; RITA O. AFONSO, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; GEORGINA RUSSELL, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; NUNO G. C. FERREIRA, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; LUIS CUNHA, UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; MARIE L. C. BARTZ, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO. |
|
Título: |
Earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage systems and secondary forest fragments in Paraná, Southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Zootaxa, v. 5255, n. 1, p. 347-361, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5255.1.28 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and 67 in SF). The highest earthworm abundance was in Faxinal (123 individuals), with 76 individuals in NTS and 47 in SF. In Mauá da Serra the same pattern was observed (SF>NTS), while in Palmeira in overall, fewer individuals (38) were collected (24 in NTS and 14 in SF). The NTS at Faxinal and SF Mauá da Serra in 2019 had only/more exotic/cosmopolitan species, while at the other dates and sites >50% of the specimens sampled were native species. Overall, forests had more native species than exotics: in 2018, natives represented > 75% of all specimens, but in 2019 both Faxinal and Mauá da Serra had more exotic species (> 65%), while at Palmeira, they represented 50% of the individuals. Earthworm total biomass for forest sites was higher in Faxinal (3.2 g) and NTS in Mauá da Serra (1.7 g) in 2019. Overall, the total biomass was higher in SF sites than NTS. Using a classification available for earthworm populations in no-tillage systems, all three sites were considered to have poor quality in terms of abundance (ind m-2), while for species richness, they were considered to have moderate (Faxinal and Mauá da Serra) and good quality (Palmeira). MenosThe area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Conservation agriculture; Ecosystem engineer; Soil macrofauna. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação do Solo; Ecossistema; Fertilidade do Solo; Minhoca. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Earthworms; Oligochaeta. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03816naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2152915
005 2023-08-17
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5255.1.28$2DOI
100 1 $aDUDAS, R. T.
245 $aEarthworm communities in long-term no-tillage systems and secondary forest fragments in Paraná, Southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aThe area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and 67 in SF). The highest earthworm abundance was in Faxinal (123 individuals), with 76 individuals in NTS and 47 in SF. In Mauá da Serra the same pattern was observed (SF>NTS), while in Palmeira in overall, fewer individuals (38) were collected (24 in NTS and 14 in SF). The NTS at Faxinal and SF Mauá da Serra in 2019 had only/more exotic/cosmopolitan species, while at the other dates and sites >50% of the specimens sampled were native species. Overall, forests had more native species than exotics: in 2018, natives represented > 75% of all specimens, but in 2019 both Faxinal and Mauá da Serra had more exotic species (> 65%), while at Palmeira, they represented 50% of the individuals. Earthworm total biomass for forest sites was higher in Faxinal (3.2 g) and NTS in Mauá da Serra (1.7 g) in 2019. Overall, the total biomass was higher in SF sites than NTS. Using a classification available for earthworm populations in no-tillage systems, all three sites were considered to have poor quality in terms of abundance (ind m-2), while for species richness, they were considered to have moderate (Faxinal and Mauá da Serra) and good quality (Palmeira).
650 $aEarthworms
650 $aOligochaeta
650 $aConservação do Solo
650 $aEcossistema
650 $aFertilidade do Solo
650 $aMinhoca
653 $aConservation agriculture
653 $aEcosystem engineer
653 $aSoil macrofauna
700 1 $aDEMETRIO, W. C.
700 1 $aMAIA, L. S.
700 1 $aSÁTIRO, J. N. O.
700 1 $aSILVA, K. A.
700 1 $aNICOLA, V. B.
700 1 $aKILLE, P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, C. M. R.
700 1 $aAFONSO, R. O.
700 1 $aRUSSELL, G.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, N. G. C.
700 1 $aCUNHA, L.
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
700 1 $aBARTZ, M. L. C.
773 $tZootaxa$gv. 5255, n. 1, p. 347-361, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/12/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA, E. H. de; SILVA, T. A. da; AONA, L. Y. S.; SOUZA, F. V. D.; LEME, E. M. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
EVERTON HILO DE SOUZA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RECÔNCAVO DA BAHIA; TIAGO ABREU DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RECÔNCAVO DA BAHIA; LIDYANNE Y. S. AONA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RECÔNCAVO DA BAHIA; FERNANDA VIDIGAL DUARTE SOUZA, CNPMF; ELTON M. C. LEME, RIO DE JANEIRO BOTANICAL GARDEN. |
|
Título: |
Hohenbergia amargosensis (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae), a new ornamental species from Bahia, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Phytotaxa, v. 567, n. 1, September, 2022. |
|
ISSN: |
1179-3163 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.567.1.8 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The authors describe Hohenbergia amargosensis, a new ornamental species of Bromeliaceae from the Atlantic Forest of the Amargosa city, in Bahia state, Brazil. This new species is morphologically related to H. reconcavensis, but can be distinguished from it by the larger plant size when in bloom, longer inflorescence with laxly arranged branches, and a broader diameter at the base, primary bracts equaling to exceeding the primary branches, primary branches with longer stipe, and lilac petals. Additionally, its conservation status and phenology are discussed, and the illustrations of this new species and its morphologically close relatives are compared. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bromeliaceae; Floresta; Mata. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Hohenbergia; Poales. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01391naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2149468
005 2023-12-14
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1179-3163
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.567.1.8$2DOI
100 1 $aSOUZA, E. H. de
245 $aHohenbergia amargosensis (Bromeliaceae$bBromelioideae), a new ornamental species from Bahia, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aThe authors describe Hohenbergia amargosensis, a new ornamental species of Bromeliaceae from the Atlantic Forest of the Amargosa city, in Bahia state, Brazil. This new species is morphologically related to H. reconcavensis, but can be distinguished from it by the larger plant size when in bloom, longer inflorescence with laxly arranged branches, and a broader diameter at the base, primary bracts equaling to exceeding the primary branches, primary branches with longer stipe, and lilac petals. Additionally, its conservation status and phenology are discussed, and the illustrations of this new species and its morphologically close relatives are compared.
650 $aHohenbergia
650 $aPoales
650 $aBromeliaceae
650 $aFloresta
650 $aMata
700 1 $aSILVA, T. A. da
700 1 $aAONA, L. Y. S.
700 1 $aSOUZA, F. V. D.
700 1 $aLEME, E. M. C.
773 $tPhytotaxa$gv. 567, n. 1, September, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Trigo; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. MenosCatálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia... Mostrar Todas |
|
Identificador: |
2826 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Código do título: |
0900592 |
|
ISSN: |
0100-6967 |
|
Código CCN: |
027582-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
DIVULGACAO AGRONOMICA |
|
Entidade: |
Shell Quimica S.A. |
|
Local de publicação: |
Sao Paulo-SP |
|
Periodicidade: |
irregular |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1959 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Algodão
1961/79 (3,5-9,11,13,14-19,21-46)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Amapá
1966 (22); 1969 (27); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1975 (36); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (46)
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental
1959 (1); 1960 (2); 1961 (3-4); 1962 (5-8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05D518
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão
1960 (1); 1962 (6); 1963 (10); 1964 (12-13,15); 1965 (16-17); 1966 (19,22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-40); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45)
Embrapa Cerrados
1959-60 (1-2); 1961 (4); 1962 (6); 1964 (11); 1965; 1966 (18-22); 1968 (24,26); 1969 (27); 1970-80 (28-47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura
1960(1-2); 1961(3-4); 1962(5-8); 1963(9-10); 1964(11-13); 1965(14-17); 1966(18-22); 1967(23); 1968(24-26); 1969(27); 1970(28-29); 1971(30-31); 1972(32); 1973(33); 1974(34-35); 1975(36-37); 1976(38-41); 1977(42); 1978(43-44); 1979(45-46); 1980(47);
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1961 (4); 1964 (12); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-21); 1967 (23); 1968/78 (25-44); 1979 (45)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Pantanal
1971-80 (30,33,38-40,42-47)
Classificação: 23A
Embrapa Rondônia
1967 (23); 1969-71 (27-30); 1973-74 33-35; 1976 (39); 1978 (43-44); 1979-80 (45-47);
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Semiárido
1960 (2); 1961 (1,3); 1962 (7-8); 1965 (14-16); 1966 (20); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47);
Embrapa Soja
1965 (17); 1966(20); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978(43-44); 1979 (46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Trigo
1960/80 (1-2) 1960; (3-4) 1961; (5-8) 1962; (9-10) 1963; (11-13) 1964; (15-16) 1965; (18-22) 1966; (23) 1967; (24-26) 1968; (27) 1969; (28-29) 1970; (30-31) 1971; (32) 1972; (33) 1973; (34-35) 1974; (36-37) 1975; (38-41) 1976; (42) 1977; (43-44) 1978; (45-46) 1979; (47) 1980.
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Uva e Vinho
1961 (1); 1962 (8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34); 1975 (35-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
